Home › Blog › Aerospace, Defense & Space › Wear & Structural Interface › Galvanic corrosion and MIL-STD-889

Aerospace, Defense & Space · Wear & Structural Interface · Design Concept

Galvanic Corrosion at Dissimilar-Metal and Chafe Interfaces: MIL-STD-889 and How an Isolation Strip Breaks the Couple

Filler chemistry × housing metal — galvanic compatibility Match the filler to the housing before optimizing resistivity. Silver-copper on bare aluminum is the classic field-corrosion failure. Aluminum /anodized Plated steel(Sn / Zn) Stainless /brass Marine /salt-spray Silver–aluminumAg/Al · Type B Silver–copperAg/Cu · Type A Nickel–graphiteNi/Gr · SSP502 Nickel–aluminumNi/Al · SSP2529/2551 ✓ ✓ ✓ ~ cond. ✗ ✓ ✓ ✗ ~ cond. ✓ ✓ ~ cond. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓preferred ✓ Preferred / benign ~ Conditional — verify ✗ Avoid — galvanic loss Per MIL-DTL-83528 / SAE-AMS-DTL-83528 filler-chemistry × housing-metal compatibility tables. Salt-spray qualification per ASTM B117 (96 hr indoor; 500–1,000+ hr marine). Representative guidance — validate the gasket/housing pairing in the application. H-O Products · Telecom & Power-Equipment EMI Shielding

A wire bundle wearing through its clamp and a carbon-fiber skin bolted to an aluminum fitting share a hidden mechanism. Put two dissimilar conductors in contact, add moisture as ordinary as humid air, and you have built a battery: one metal corrodes to protect the other. The fix is to interrupt one leg of the circuit. This article explains the galvanic series and MIL-STD-889 qualitatively, why carbon fiber is the aggressor people forget, why chafe makes it worse, and how an insulating interface breaks the couple.

Engine compartment with wires and components

Request a quote for your project →

Two metals, a little moisture, and an electrical path: the recipe for galvanic corrosion

A wire bundle wearing through its clamp and a carbon-fiber skin bolted to an aluminum fitting look like two unrelated problems, but they share a hidden mechanism. Put two dissimilar conductors in electrical contact, add an electrolyte as ordinary as humid air or a film of condensation, and you have built a battery. One metal becomes the anode and gives up material; the other is protected at its expense.

The corrosion is not a coating defect or a bad batch; it is electrochemistry doing exactly what it must, and the cure is to interrupt one leg of the circuit.

What the galvanic series actually tells you

Materials can be ranked by how readily they give up electrons in a given environment, and the further apart two materials sit on that ranking, the stronger the voltage driving corrosion when they touch. MIL-STD-889 tabulates these dissimilar-metal relationships and the compatibility of common aerospace material couples, qualitatively flagging which pairings are problematic. The practical takeaway is not a number to memorize but a habit: at any joint between dissimilar conductors, ask how far apart they sit and whether moisture can reach the interface.

The bigger the separation and the wetter the joint, the more aggressively the anode corrodes.

Why carbon fiber is the aggressor people forget

Engineers instinctively watch metal-to-metal joints, but carbon-fiber reinforced polymer is electrically conductive and sits at the noble, cathodic end relative to aluminum. Bolt CFRP directly to an aluminum fitting with a wet path between them and the aluminum becomes the sacrificial anode, corroding around the joint. Because the composite looks inert, the couple is easy to overlook, which is exactly why composite-to-aluminum interfaces are a classic place to design in an isolation layer from the start.

Chafe makes a galvanic joint worse

Protective finishes, anodize layers, and natural oxides are what normally keep a marginal couple quiet. Rubbing destroys them. Where a line or bracket chafes, every cycle scrapes away the protective layer and exposes fresh metal and fresh electrical contact, so fretting and galvanic attack reinforce each other: the wear keeps renewing the bare, conductive surface the corrosion needs. A part that only resists wear, or only insulates, addresses half the problem at a chafe-plus-dissimilar-metal interface.

Breaking the couple with an insulating interface

Separate the metals electrically

The most direct fix is a dielectric barrier that interrupts the electrical path. A rigid glass-epoxy laminate, an FR-4 class spacer, or a Durostone isolator carries the bolted load while keeping the metals from touching, with dielectric strength reported per ASTM D149 on the TDS. Where the separation must be thin, aramid paper supplies a conformable dielectric shim.

Exclude the electrolyte

No moisture path, no galvanic cell. Sealing the joint so condensation cannot bridge the two metals attacks the same circuit from the other side, which is why isolation strips are often paired with a sealing or barrier layer rather than used alone. Breaking the electrical path and excluding the electrolyte are complementary, not alternative, measures.

Combine isolation with anti-chafe in one part

At a chafe-plus-dissimilar-metal interface, the ideal part both insulates and resists wear so the protective separation is not scrubbed away. UHMW-PE and PTFE-coated fiberglass strips do exactly that: a tough, low-friction, electrically insulating face that keeps the metals apart and survives the rubbing that would otherwise renew the couple.

Reference Table · Interface Problem to Direction

Matching the Material to the Mechanism

Why a qualitative map: the right material depends on whether the joint carries load, sees motion, or needs a thin shim, and whether moisture can reach it. These are directional relationships, not corrosion-protection findings.
InterfaceMechanism at workMaterial direction
Dissimilar metals, bolted loadGalvanic couple under clamp preloadRigid G-10 / FR-4 / Durostone isolator that carries load
Composite to aluminumCFRP cathodic; aluminum corrodes as anodeDielectric barrier plus moisture exclusion
Chafe at a dissimilar-metal pointWear renews bare metal; fretting plus galvanicUHMW / PTFE-coated glass that insulates and resists wear
Thin clearance, must isolateElectrical contact with little spaceAramid or skived PTFE dielectric shim

Directional guidance only; material selection does not by itself constitute corrosion protection. Finishes, sealing, and program requirements govern the corrosion outcome.

The pattern: separate the metals, exclude the moisture, resist the rub

Every galvanic-plus-chafe failure traces back to one of three open legs: the metals are in electrical contact, an electrolyte can reach them, or the wear keeps renewing bare surface. A well-chosen interface part closes the legs that apply: a dielectric laminate separates, a sealing layer excludes the moisture, and a tough low-friction face survives the rubbing. Name which legs are open at your joint and the material direction follows; treat the joint as only a wear problem or only an isolation problem and the part will address half of it.

Isolation material is one input to corrosion control, not the determination. H-O supplies the converted dielectric and wear parts to your drawing and the maker's published dielectric and wear properties. Whether a given couple is acceptable, and what finishes and sealing it needs, is a corrosion-engineering judgment that belongs to your program; H-O makes no galvanic-compatibility or corrosion-protection findings.

How H-O Products helps

H-O Products waterjets, machines, die-cuts, and laminates the isolation and wear families above to your drawing in Winsted, Connecticut. We machine G-10, FR-4, and Durostone isolators to tolerance, cut UHMW and PTFE-coated-fiberglass anti-chafe strips with adhesive backings, slit aramid shims, and kit isolation-and-wear sets by joint location, all under our ISO 9001:2015 certified quality management system with lot-coded traceability and the maker's TDS on the order.

Frequently asked questions

Why does carbon fiber against aluminum corrode, and what prevents it?

Carbon-fiber reinforced polymer is electrically conductive and sits at the noble, cathodic end relative to aluminum, so when the two are in contact with a moisture path the aluminum becomes the sacrificial anode and corrodes around the joint. Preventing it means interrupting the couple: a dielectric barrier such as a glass-epoxy laminate or aramid shim to separate the metals, combined with sealing to exclude moisture. The acceptability of any couple is a corrosion-engineering judgment for your program.

What does MIL-STD-889 tell me about dissimilar metals?

MIL-STD-889 tabulates dissimilar-metal relationships and the compatibility of common material couples, qualitatively flagging problematic pairings. It is the reference engineers use to decide whether a joint needs isolation. We cite it by designation for orientation; H-O supplies the insulating material, while the compatibility determination and any required finishes belong to your corrosion engineering.

Why does chafe make galvanic corrosion worse?

Protective finishes, anodize, and oxides normally keep a marginal couple quiet. Rubbing scrapes them away, exposing fresh metal and fresh electrical contact every cycle, so fretting wear and galvanic attack reinforce each other. That is why a chafe-plus-dissimilar-metal interface needs a part that both insulates and resists wear, such as a UHMW or PTFE-coated-fiberglass strip, rather than one that only does one job.

Can one part both isolate dissimilar metals and resist chafe?

Yes, and at a chafe-plus-dissimilar-metal interface that is the right approach. UHMW-PE and PTFE-coated fiberglass are tough, low-friction, and electrically insulating, so a single strip keeps the metals apart and survives the rubbing that would otherwise renew the couple. For a bolted structural joint, a rigid G-10, FR-4, or Durostone isolator carries the load while it separates.

Does H-O certify galvanic compatibility or corrosion protection?

No. H-O supplies converted dielectric and wear parts to your drawing along with the maker's published dielectric and wear properties. Whether a couple is acceptable, and what isolation, sealing, and finishes it requires, is a corrosion-engineering judgment that belongs to your program. We make no galvanic-compatibility, corrosion-protection, or airworthiness determinations.

Have a dissimilar-metal interface reviewed

Tell us the two materials meeting at the joint, whether it carries load or sees chafe, and whether moisture can reach it, and we will recommend an isolation or wear material direction and quote converted parts to your drawing.

Samples typically ship in 3 to 5 business days for common die-cut configurations on materials we keep on hand; standard production runs about two weeks after drawing approval; expedited service is available. MOQ varies by material and part.

Family-owned in Winsted, Connecticut since 1971 · ISO 9001:2015 certified · OEMs worldwide send us a drawing — and get back their part.

Related reading

Request a quote

Request a quote for your anti-chafe & wear interface part

Send H-O your drawing or describe the part—engineering reviews every RFQ and converts samples on your geometry.

Contact
Company address
Your application
Part & quantity
Typical response in one business day. Samples typically 3–5 business days; production in about 2 weeks.

Last updated · Reviewed by H-O Products engineering (ISO 9001:2015 certified converter, Winsted, CT).

References

  • MIL-STD-889 (dissimilar metals), cited qualitatively; ASTM D149 (dielectric strength of solid insulating materials).
  • AMS 3662 (UHMW-PE sheet, by designation); UL 94 (flammability classes, per grade TDS). The galvanic series is standard electrochemistry, summarized qualitatively; H-O makes no corrosion-protection determinations.
  • Manufacturer technical data sheets: G-10 / FR-4 and Durostone laminates, UHMW-PE film and strip, PTFE-coated fiberglass 6085 series, virgin skived PTFE film, Nomex aramid paper.

This article summarizes anti-chafe, wear, and structural-interface material principles using the families and designations cited on the parent application page. Comparisons are qualitative; mechanical and dielectric values are per each grade's current technical data sheet, and no test results are quoted.

MIL-STD-889 and AMS designations are named for orientation only; H-O makes no galvanic-compatibility, corrosion-protection, or airworthiness determinations. All parts are custom manufactured to order; minimum production run quantities vary by material and part. H-O is a converter, not a raw-material producer.

H-O Products Corp · Precision die-cut converting · Winsted, CT · ISO 9001:2015 certified organization