Home › Blog › EV & Battery › Thermal Runaway & Fire Protection › How to spec a barrier

EV & Battery · Thermal Runaway & Fire Protection · How to Spec

How to Spec a Thermal-Runaway or Fire-Protection Barrier: What to Send H-O for a Quote

820x360|

A barrier RFQ is different from a gasket RFQ in one important way: the material cannot be named until the job is split. "Thermal barrier, 1 mm, per the attached DXF" could be an aerogel isolation layer, a mica vent shield, a laminated propagation barrier, or a cushioning foam with flame duty, and each is a different part with a different price.

The H-O applications team works from the ten-item checklist below, taken from the parent application page's own what-to-send list. Send it complete and the first reply is a family direction, a ply construction if the job needs one, and a quote.

Request a quote for your project →

The ten things to send, and what each decides

Send thisWhat it decides
1. Barrier location in the packCell-to-cell, module wall, vent path, busbar zone, or compartment liner. Location sets the duty profile and the geometry constraints before any material talk.
2. The job: isolation, flame, or bothThe fundamental split. Conduction-slowing and flame-and-ejecta survival are different physics; "both" usually means a laminated construction rather than one material.
3. Available thickness / gapThe hardest constraint in most packs. Thin gaps push toward aerogel; generous gaps open more options; no material can be chosen without it.
4. Compression range (if a cell gap)A compressible barrier performs at its in-service compressed thickness, which moves as cells breathe and swell, so the range belongs on the drawing, not in a follow-up email.
5. Temperature exposureContinuous service temperature and the event exposure are different numbers; the second decides the flame-face ply, the first the everyday materials.
6. Any electrical-isolation roleIf the barrier also isolates a busbar or terminal, the dielectric requirement is verified separately per grade; it is never assumed from the thermal role.
7. Propagation / flammability methodWhich method governs your assembly (UL 9540A, GB 38031, UL 2596-type material behavior, UL 94 class), so candidate constructions are compared against the right yardstick.
8. Barrier footprint and cut-outsThe converting plan: die-cut, kiss-cut, laser, or waterjet, and how the cut-outs and edges interact with friable layers.
9. Facing / encapsulation needsAerogel and some inorganic papers shed when cut; a facing film, edge encapsulation, or capture lamination keeps the line clean. Cleanliness requirements belong here.
10. Prototype and annual volumeMethod and price structure; prototype quantities through production runs are equally accepted.
The parent page's framing is worth repeating: six of these (location, job, thickness, temperature, electrical role, governing method) move a recommendation "from a guess to a real direction." The other four make the same RFQ quotable. Send what you have; the reply will name what is missing.

What engineering does with the list

Items 1 through 3 sort the family shortlist: aerogel blanket for thin-gap conduction, EV firewall barrier sheet (and the broader thermal and fire barrier constructions) where propagation governs, mica barrier sheet where very high temperature meets an electrical role, glass-fiber paper as the thin inorganic ply, and high-temperature silicone foam where the layer must also cushion.

Items 4 and 5 check the shortlist against the real duty (compressed thickness, continuous versus event temperature). Item 6 routes any dielectric duty to the grade's electrical data.

Item 7 selects the comparison method, with the honest boundary stated every time: material-level behavior comes from the manufacturer's data sheet under methods like UL 2596 and UL 94, and assembly-level outcomes under UL 9540A or GB 38031 belong to your tested pack.

Items 8 through 10 set the converting plan, including facing and encapsulation for friable layers and lamination where the answer is a multi-ply construction supplied as one part.

What happens after you send it

  1. Drawing review. Typically opened the same business day; the reply is a family or construction direction, or the specific missing items.
  2. Construction proposal and quote. Family and grade direction (or a ply stack with each layer's job named), converting method, facing and encapsulation plan, and pricing at your quantities, with grade data cited to the manufacturer's TDS.
  3. Samples. Typically 3 to 5 business days for common die-cut configurations on materials on hand; laminated constructions are quoted with their own sample timing.
  4. Production. Standard production runs about two weeks after drawing approval; special orders are quoted to the job. MOQ varies by material and part.

Documentation available on request: material technical data sheets for every ply, certificate of conformance, lot traceability, and first-article inspection, under our ISO 9001:2015 certified quality management system. H-O is a die-cut converter, not a raw-material producer: we do not make the aerogel, mica, paper, sheet, or foam, and we do not certify a material to UL 9540A or GB 38031; no pass or number is claimed.

The mistakes this checklist prevents

Spec mistakeWhat it causesChecklist item that catches it
"Thermal barrier" with no job splitAn insulator on a vent path, or a flame sheet asked to insulateItem 2
Free-thickness data on a compressed layerIn-service performance differs from the bench valueItems 3 and 4
Event temperature used as service temperatureEveryday materials over-specified; cost without benefitItem 5
Dielectric duty discovered at validationA flame-qualified part that fails an electrical checkItem 6
Friable layer cut bareDust on the battery line; cleanliness rejectionsItem 9
Propagation "pass" expected from a materialA claim no raw material can carry; assembly testing surprisedItem 7, with the boundary stated

Frequently asked questions

Can H-O recommend a barrier without the cell format and event details?

We can narrow the family from location, job, gap, and temperature, which is most of the way. But cell format and the governing method matter for the construction (a pouch stack's breathing range changes the compliant ply; a propagation requirement changes the core), so the recommendation is provisional until those arrive. The reply will say exactly which items the direction is waiting on.

How are friable materials like aerogel handled on the drawing?

Call out the cleanliness requirement and let the converting plan answer it: a facing film on one or both sides, edge encapsulation after cutting, or lamination that captures the friable core between cleaner skins. These are normal converting operations at H-O, specified per the manufacturer's allowances for the grade, and they should appear on the drawing as part of the part, not as a line-side workaround.

What if my barrier needs to satisfy two methods at once?

List both in item 7. A vent shield might be compared under UL 2596-type behavior while the pack pursues GB 38031 propagation compliance; a cell-to-cell layer might carry a UL 94 class while supporting a UL 9540A program. Material-level behavior and assembly-level outcomes live at different levels, and naming both up front keeps the candidate comparison honest.

Does a laminated construction cost more than a single material?

It depends on the alternative. A laminate has more plies and a lamination step, but it usually replaces a thicker, more expensive single material that still would not do both jobs, and it is supplied as one die-cut part with no extra line labor. Send the volumes in item 10 and the quote will show the comparison at your quantities rather than in the abstract.

Send the checklist, get a barrier quote

Attach the footprint and as many of the ten items as you have. Drawing review typically starts the same business day.

Samples typically 3 to 5 business days; production about two weeks; MOQ varies by material and part. Expedited service available.

Family-owned in Winsted, Connecticut since 1971 · ISO 9001:2015 certified · OEMs worldwide send us a drawing — and get back their part.

Related reading

Thermal-path stack (ASTM D5470): through-path vs in-plane spreading Cross-section of a power module thermal stack. From top: power module, a TIM or graphite spreader layer, a bonded heat spreader, and the heat sink. Downward arrows show the through-path where heat conducts straight down; sideways arrows show in-plane spreading where a graphite film moves heat laterally into the structure. An annotation notes that the gap and tolerance at the joint picks the construction: a thin bonded film for flat clamped joints, or a compliant filler for uneven stack heights. THERMAL PATH · ASTM D5470 Thermal-path stack: through-path vs in-plane The ordered stack POWER MODULE TIM / GRAPHITE SPREADER BONDED HEAT SPREADER HEAT SINK ↓↓ ← → Through-path ↓ TIM carries heat straight to the sink In-plane ↔ graphite film moves heat sideways Graphite is anisotropic: in-plane and through-plane conduct differently. Gap & tolerance picks it Tight, flat joint small gap thin bonded film; clip-free mount Uneven / large gap wide gap TIM / graphite spreader Bonded heat spreader Heat sink TIM = thermal interface material. Thermal path per ASTM D5470; a spreader is not a through-path TIM. Representative — validate in the application.
ApplicationEV Battery Thermal Runaway & Fire Protection BarriersRead →
GuideAerogel, Firewall Barrier Sheet, Mica, Glass-Fiber Paper, or Silicone Foam: Selecting an EV Thermal-Runaway BarrierRead → GuideThermal Isolation vs. Fire Protection: How to Layer an EV Thermal-Runaway Barrier StackRead → Wide reference photo of die-cut materials across an EV battery pack and vehicle: compression pads between cells, closed-cell silicone perimeter seals, a thermal IndustryEV & Battery hubRead →
Request a quote

Request a quote for your EV thermal-runaway & fire protection part

Send H-O your drawing or describe the part—engineering reviews every RFQ and converts samples on your geometry.

Contact
Company address
Your application
Part & quantity
Typical response in one business day. Samples typically 3–5 business days; production in about 2 weeks.

Last updated · Reviewed by H-O Products engineering (ISO 9001:2015 certified converter, Winsted, CT).

References

  • UL 2596 (battery enclosure material behavior under flame with entrained particles); UL 94 (flammability classifications).
  • UL 9540A and GB 38031 (assembly-level propagation methods); UN 38.3 (transport, pack level); ASTM E162 / E662 (flammability and smoke characterization).
  • Manufacturer technical data sheets: aerogel blanket, EV firewall barrier sheet, mica barrier sheet, glass-fiber paper, high-temperature silicone foam.

This checklist supports a quotation workflow; it does not constitute design guidance for any specific pack. Grade-level behavior is confirmed on the manufacturer's current technical data sheet at your thickness and compression; propagation outcomes belong to the tested cell, module, pack, or system. All parts are custom manufactured to order; minimum production run quantities vary by material and part. H-O is a die-cut converter, not a raw-material producer.

H-O Products Corp · Precision die-cut converting · Winsted, CT · ISO 9001:2015 certified organization