HomeIndustriesEV & BatteryEV Battery Compression & Cushioning
Talk to an engineer(860) 469-1144 Get a quote
Custom Die-Cut EV Battery Compression Pads · For EV battery design & sourcing engineers

Custom Cell-to-Cell & Cell-to-Module Compression Pads for EV Batteries

Wide reference photo of EV battery compression pads in application context – a prismatic-cell module stack showing die-cut microcellular polyurethane compression pads placed between cells and against the module end plate, illustrating the cell-to-cell and cell-to-module compression interface

H-O Products converts microcellular polyurethane (PORON® and PORON® EVExtend) and BISCO® silicone foam into die-cut cell-to-cell and cell-to-module compression pads that hold a near-constant push-back force as a lithium-ion cell breathes and swells across its service life. Built to your stack drawing.

Built for: pouch and prismatic cell stacks, module end-plate cushions, cell-to-pack (CTP) tolerance take-up, and swelling accommodation in EV and energy-storage battery packs.

01
10–20%
Cell thickness increase at end of life
Research indicates lithium-ion cells commonly run roughly 10–20% thicker at end of life from irreversible swelling; the pad holds a near-constant push-back force across that growing deflection.
02
20–40 kPa
Commonly cited optimal pouch-cell compression window
A frequently cited target preload range for pouch cells; confirm the window for your cell against your cell supplier's guidance and your own qualification testing.
03
20–60%
CFD working “plateau” compression range
The useful zone of a microcellular-foam force-deflection curve, between the linear-elastic toe (~0–20%) and the densification knee (>~60%). Size pad thickness so the swollen EOL state stays on this plateau.
04
11
Standards & peer-reviewed studies cited
ASTM D3574, ASTM D395, ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384, ISO 3386, UL 94, UN 38.3, UL 9540A, and four peer-reviewed lithium-ion studies, referenced inline and listed below.
Quick Answer

A cell-to-cell or cell-to-module compression pad is an engineered foam placed between battery cells, or between a cell and the module end plate, that holds a near-constant push-back force as the cell changes thickness. Every lithium-ion cell breathes reversibly each cycle and swells irreversibly over life – cells commonly run about 10–20% thicker at end of life – and the pad is specified so its force stays inside a useful window across that deflection.

The remaining zones and duties are mapped in the When-to-spec list on this page. Values are per the TDS on file; see the material reference below for ordering details.

Standards Referenced

ASTM D395 (Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property – Compression Set; Method B, constant deflection, the most specified procedure) · ASTM D3574 (Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials – Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams; includes compression set on original height and the Test C force-deflection procedure) · ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384 (stress relaxation / force decay at constant strain) · UL 94 (Flammability of polymeric materials; foam classes HBF and HF-1, and V-0 for the most stringent vertical-burn requirement) · UN 38.3 (lithium-cell transport safety) · UL 9540A (thermal-runaway propagation test method for energy-storage systems).

Pad-level materials support pack compliance with UN 38.3 and UL 9540A; they are not themselves certified to those pack-level standards.

When To Spec What
  • Pouch cell-to-cell, light/moderate preload: PORON® EVExtend softer grades
  • Prismatic cell-to-cell or cell-to-end-plate: firmer PORON® EVExtend grades
  • Low compression set across a long service life: PORON® microcellular PU
  • Higher continuous temperature or UL 94 V-0 needed: BISCO® silicone foam
  • Cell-to-pack (CTP) tolerance take-up + controlled preload: PORON microcellular PU, grade by gap and swell
  • Pure thermal gap fill (not controlled spring force): a gap-fill material – the wrong tool for compression duty
  • Irregular surface, very low closure force: a softer microcellular PU grade to the stack
LocationMade in Winsted, CT · Family-owned since 1971 · ISO 9001:2015 Certified
How it works
  1. 1
    Send drawing
    Upload a DXF, STEP, or PDF of the cell stack, or describe the application. A sample part works too.
  2. 2
    Material review
    Engineering reviews the call-out against the vendor TDS and checks the target preload, the beginning-of-life gap and end-of-life swelling allowance, the CFD plateau, compression set, stress relaxation, operating temperature, and any flame rating.
  3. 3
    Prototype
    Typically 3–5 business days for common configurations. Standard production 2 weeks; special orders run custom lead times.
  4. 4
    Production
    Tooling refined, ongoing converted parts to drawing with material traceability and lot-code TDS records.
COMPRESSION · CELL CUSHIONINGDie-cut pad holds stack pressure as cells swellCELL SWELLS OVER LIFEbattery cellDIE-CUT PAD ABSORBS ITpack wall
H-O compression pads to the stack so cell swell is absorbed and stack pressure stays in spec.
Who this is for

This guide is for battery pack engineers, mechanical designers, sourcing teams, and manufacturing engineers specifying cell-to-cell or cell-to-module compression pads for pouch and prismatic EV battery assemblies.

Prototype-to-Production Compression Pad Manufacturing · Battery Stack Compression Pad Converting

Battery stack problem → material selection → converted pad → production supply.

  1. 1
    Cell gap / swelling requirement
    Start from the beginning-of-life gap and the end-of-life swelling allowance your cell stack has to absorb.
  2. 2
    Select CFD range
    Pick the compression-force-deflection window that keeps useful preload across that deflection on the flat plateau.
  3. 3
    Choose material family
    PORON® microcellular PU or PORON® EVExtend for the flattest curve and lowest set; BISCO® silicone foam for temperature or flame.
  4. 4
    Add adhesive / liner / pull tab
    Call out the adhesive side, the release-liner configuration, and pull-tabs for repeatable peel-and-place on the line.
  5. 5
    Die-cut to drawing
    H-O die-cuts, kiss-cuts, laser- or waterjet-cuts the pad to your stack drawing and stacks to a target thickness.
  6. 6
    Quote prototype or production
    Send the drawing for engineering review and a quote on prototype or production converted pads.
Push-back force decay over service life Qualitative plot of a cell compression pad's push-back force versus service life. The force starts at the beginning-of-life preload and decays through the useful window as compression set and stress relaxation accumulate, approaching end of life. No numeric values are shown. SPEC DISCIPLINE · FORCE OVER LIFE Push-back force decays across service life Compression set and stress relaxation erode a pad's push-back force over the years. Useful window Push-back force higher slack Service life beginning of life end of life Beginning-of-life preload End-of-life force Force decays as set + relaxation accumulate High-set grade: drifts below window Push-back force over life High-set grade (fails window) Useful window Compression set is lost thickness after release; stress relaxation is force decay atconstant strain. Weigh both for long-life packs. Qualitative shape only. Representative — validate in the application.
Converted Cell-to-Cell Cushioning Materials · Where it lives

Application Zones

Three distinct compression problems hide inside any modern EV or energy-storage battery pack: the cell-to-cell joint, where a pad between adjacent pouch or prismatic cells has to keep electrode layers in contact while the cell breathes each cycle and swells over life; the cell-to-module joint, where a thicker cushion between the cell group and the rigid end plate absorbs the accumulated swelling of the whole stack and holds preload against the frame; and the cell-to-pack joint in module-less (CTP / cell-to-chassis) designs, where the same pad also takes up build tolerance and damps vibration.

Click a tab to see the environment, the standards commonly referenced, and the materials H-O converts for that zone.

Cell-to-cell compression between adjacent pouch or prismatic cells

Standards: ASTM D3574 (CFD / compression set), ASTM D6147 (stress relaxation)Typical duty: thin pad, flat CFD plateau, low compression set

The cell-to-cell pad is the thin foam layer that sits directly between two adjacent cells in a stack. Pouch cells have no rigid housing and rely on external compression for mechanical and electrochemical stability; prismatic cells are stiffer but still benefit from controlled stack pressure. The cell changes thickness twice over: a small reversible "breathing" each cycle as lithium moves into and out of the graphite anode, and a larger irreversible swelling over life from gas and solid-electrolyte-interphase growth.

Research indicates a light-to-moderate preload commonly helps capacity retention and life, while over-compression can accelerate aging – so the pad is specified for a flat CFD plateau (so the force barely changes as the cell grows) and low compression set (so the pad does not thin out and go slack). A microcellular polyurethane such as PORON® EVExtend or general PORON® PU is the default for this joint; specify compression set per ASTM D3574 or ASTM D395 and CFD per ASTM D3574 Test C at the deflection your stack sees.

PORON® EVExtend microcellular polyurethane (softer grades)Purpose-built battery compression grades. Flat CFD plateau across the working deflection, low compression set, thin gauges for cell-to-cell duty. Softer grades suit pouch cell-to-cell joints where light preload is the target.
PORON® microcellular polyurethane (general)Low-compression-set microcellular PU with a fine cell structure, available across a range of thicknesses. The general-purpose choice when an EVExtend battery grade is not specified; verify the grade-level CFD and compression set against the TDS for your deflection.
BISCO® silicone foamSilicone-foam alternative for cell-to-cell joints that run hotter or that call for a UL 94 flame rating. Higher continuous-temperature capability than PU; pair against PORON in the comparison table to weigh the trade-off.
Generic gap-fill foam (contrast, not recommended for compression duty)A gap filler is chosen for thermal conductance and tolerance take-up, not for a controlled spring force. Its stress-strain shape is wrong for compression duty and it may relax or spike out of the useful window. Listed here only to mark the contrast.

Grade-level properties, standards and caveats for these families are in the material reference below — one card per family, with the TDS links.

Cell-to-module and end-plate cushion

Standards: ASTM D3574 (CFD / compression set), UL 94 (flame), ASTM D6147 (stress relaxation)Typical duty: thicker cushion, firmer grade, holds preload against the frame

The cell-to-module cushion is the thicker foam pad between the cell group and the module wall or end plate. Where the cell-to-cell pad manages the gap between two cells, the end-plate cushion absorbs the accumulated swelling of the entire stack and holds preload against the rigid module frame. Because the deflection is larger and the force higher, this joint commonly uses a firmer microcellular PU grade, or BISCO silicone foam where the module runs hotter or where a flame rating is a contract requirement.

The same engineering rules apply: keep the force inside the useful window across the full beginning-of-life-to-end-of-life deflection, keep compression set low so the cushion does not take a permanent set, and keep stress relaxation low so the held force does not decay at constant strain. Specify stress relaxation per ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384 for cushions that must hold force for many years.

PORON® EVExtend microcellular polyurethane (firmer grades)Firmer EVExtend battery grades for the larger deflection and higher force at the end plate. Flat CFD plateau and low compression set hold preload against the rigid module frame across life.
BISCO® silicone foamFor end-plate cushions on hotter modules or where UL 94 V-0 is mandated. Higher continuous-temperature capability and flame performance than PU, traded against a different force-deflection behavior – weigh both in the comparison table.
PORON® microcellular polyurethane (general)General microcellular PU for end-plate cushions where an EVExtend grade is not specified. Verify CFD and compression set against the TDS for the cushion thickness and target deflection.
Generic gap-fill foam (contrast)Specified for thermal conductance or simple tolerance take-up, not for holding a controlled cushion force across stack swelling. Wrong stress-strain shape for an end-plate compression duty.

Grade-level properties, standards and caveats for these families are in the material reference below — one card per family, with the TDS links.

Cell-to-pack (CTP) and cell-to-chassis tolerance take-up

Standards: ASTM D3574 (CFD / compression set), ASTM D6147 (stress relaxation), UL 9540A (pack-level context)Typical duty: combined preload, tolerance take-up, swelling accommodation, vibration damping

In cell-to-pack (CTP) and cell-to-chassis architectures the intermediate module housing is deleted and cells are integrated directly into the pack or the vehicle structure. With the module frame gone, the compression pad takes on several jobs at once: it compensates for build tolerance between cells and the pack structure, it accommodates the swelling of the cell group, it holds controlled preload, and it damps vibration.

That multi-duty role makes the flat CFD plateau and low compression set even more important – the pad has to keep force inside the useful window across a wider tolerance band and a longer deflection, without taking a permanent set. A microcellular polyurethane grade chosen by the beginning-of-life gap, the end-of-life swelling allowance, and the target preload is the usual answer; BISCO silicone foam is the alternative where temperature or flame requirements govern.

Pad-level material choices support pack-level compliance with UN 38.3 and UL 9540A but are not themselves certified to those standards.

PORON® microcellular polyurethaneThe general microcellular PU choice for CTP tolerance take-up and swelling accommodation. Low compression set and a flat CFD plateau hold preload across a wider tolerance band; grade by gap, swell, and target force.
PORON® EVExtend microcellular polyurethanePurpose-built battery grades where the CTP design needs a tightly controlled push-back curve across the stack deflection. Flat CFD plateau and low compression set across the working range.
BISCO® silicone foamFor CTP packs that run hotter or that call for UL 94 flame performance at the pad. Pair against PORON in the comparison table; the silicone trade-off is temperature and flame versus the PU force-deflection behavior.
Generic gap-fill foam (contrast)A thermal gap filler take-up part is not a compression pad. Using it where controlled preload, swelling accommodation, and vibration damping are required is a common mis-specification – see the failure-modes section.

Grade-level properties, standards and caveats for these families are in the material reference below — one card per family, with the TDS links.

Spec discipline

Six decisions that drive your compression-pad spec

A compression pad is not a single-property optimization. The right pad satisfies several independent constraints at once, and missing any one produces a pack that assembles fine, passes its first checkout, and starts losing capacity or going slack well into service. Read the six factors below before reaching for a grade.

Specification principle

Match the pad to the joint and its deflection, not to the catalog. A pad is doing its job when its force stays inside a useful window from the beginning-of-life gap through end-of-life swelling. Pick the grade by the gap, the swell allowance, and the target push-back – not by the headline foam density.

~10–20%
Typical end-of-life thickness growth of a lithium-ion cell

Cells breathe reversibly each cycle and swell irreversibly over life; research indicates many cell formats commonly run roughly 10–20% thicker at end of life. The compression pad has to keep its push-back force inside a useful window across that growing deflection. A pad sized only for the beginning-of-life gap will over-compress as the cell swells; a pad with a steep force curve will spike out of the window. The flat CFD plateau is what makes the force stable across the deflection.

Read the six factors below in order. Each one constrains the others – the preload window sets the CFD target, which sets the grade and thickness, which sets the compression-set and stress-relaxation requirements at the temperature class. Selecting one factor at a time and re-optimizing the others is the discipline.

Show all six selection factors tap to expand
1

Preload is a window, and it is a "Goldilocks" decision

Controlled compression matters because a lithium-ion cell needs its electrode layers held in contact, but not crushed. Research indicates that a light-to-moderate preload commonly improves capacity retention and life versus an unconstrained cell, while over-compression may accelerate aging by closing separator pores and making electrode utilization non-uniform. Reported beneficial and harmful pressure levels vary widely by cell chemistry, format, and test, so this page does not publish a single target number.

The takeaway is qualitative and well-supported: aim for the lighter end that keeps the layers in contact, give the cell room to swell, and avoid driving the pad into over-compression at end of life. Set the preload window first; it governs every other factor below.

Treat preload as a window bounded by your cell maker's guidance and your stack stiffness, not a single set-point. Light/moderate preload commonly helps; over-compression may hurt.
2

CFD (compression force deflection) is the push-back curve, not one number

Compression force deflection is the stress (kPa or psi) the pad pushes back with at a given percent compression, measured per ASTM D3574 Test C (the related ISO method is ISO 3386). A vendor value at a single compression tells you little; what matters is the shape of the curve. Microcellular foam shows a roughly linear-elastic region at low compression, then a wide plateau in the working zone where the force barely changes, then a steep densification region where the force rises sharply.

The whole point of a compression pad is to live on that plateau: as the cell swells and the pad compresses further, the push-back force stays nearly constant. Demand the CFD curve from the TDS and confirm your deflection lands on the plateau, not in densification.

ASTM D3574 Test C / ISO 3386 define the CFD test. Spec the force at your working deflection and confirm it sits on the flat plateau, not in the densification knee.
3

Compression set determines whether the pad holds force over the years

Compression set is the permanent thickness a foam loses after being compressed, held, and released – the "memory" the pad does not recover. Lower is better. It is measured per ASTM D395 (Method B is constant deflection and the most specified) or ASTM D3574 for flexible PU foam, with results reported against the original height; ASTM D1056 reports against the compressed height for sponge, so values from different methods are not directly comparable.

A pad with high compression set thins out under sustained load, so it pushes back with less force, and eventually goes slack – the cell can then move, layers can lose contact, and any cooling or sealing contact at the joint is lost. Purpose-built microcellular PU battery grades are specified precisely because they hold a low compression set across the service life; verify the method and temperature on the TDS.

ASTM D395 Method B / ASTM D3574: lower compression set is better. Note the method and temperature – values are not comparable across D395, D3574, and D1056.
4

Stress relaxation is the slow force decay you only see over time

Stress relaxation is the loss of push-back force when a foam is held at a constant strain over time, measured per ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384. It is different from compression set: compression set is about thickness recovery after release, while stress relaxation is about force decay while the pad stays compressed. For a compression pad that sits at a fixed strain inside a stack for ten to fifteen years, stress relaxation is what tells you whether the held preload is still there at end of life.

A pad that starts at the right force but relaxes heavily over time can drift below the useful window even though it never visibly thinned. Ask for stress-relaxation data on the grade you are considering, and weight it heavily for long-life packs.

ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384: the lower the force decay at constant strain, the better the pad holds preload over a long service life.
5

Temperature and flame rating decide PORON PU versus silicone foam

Microcellular polyurethane such as PORON covers the temperature range of most EV battery modules and delivers the flattest CFD plateau and lowest compression set, which is why it leads for compression duty.

Where the module runs hotter than PU's continuous-service range, or where the program mandates a stringent flame rating, BISCO silicone foam is the alternative: it offers higher continuous-temperature capability and stronger flame performance, with UL 94 ratings available up to V-0 on specific grades, traded against a different force-deflection behavior.

Foam flame classes appear as HBF and HF-1 for low-density materials and V-0 for the most stringent vertical-burn requirement; ratings are thickness- and grade-specific, so verify the exact rating on the TDS for your gauge. Specify temperature class and any UL 94 requirement up front; it narrows the material family before any other choice.

PORON microcellular PU for the flattest curve and lowest set in normal module temperatures; BISCO silicone foam for higher temperature or UL 94 V-0. Verify the rating per grade and thickness.
6

Drawing-to-die-cut: what your compression-pad converter has to deliver

A compression pad is a converted part, and the form factor is set by the stack design. H-O the pad to your drawing: through-cutting for separated pads, kiss-cutting on the release liner for assembly-line peel-and-place, laser or waterjet for tight or soft profiles, and adhesive lamination where the pad has to stay located on a cell or end plate. Multi-layer parts can be stacked to a target thickness, and liners with pull-tabs make installation repeatable on the line.

Tolerances are held to the material and the cutting method. Every pad is made-to-order from your spec; bring the beginning-of-life gap, the end-of-life swelling allowance, the target force, the temperature class, and any flame requirement, and engineering will confirm the grade, thickness, and converting approach before tooling is committed.

Side by side

PORON microcellular PU vs silicone foam vs generic gap-fill foam

The three families an EV battery engineer weighs for a compression joint, compared on the properties that actually decide the spec. Cell values are cautious and qualitative where the dossier does not support a precise figure; where a property is grade- and thickness-specific, the cell says so. Click a material name to jump to its full reference entry.

Property PORON® microcellular PUincl. PORON® EVExtend battery grades BISCO® silicone foam Generic gap-fill foam(contrast – not a compression pad)
Mechanical behavior (what makes a compression pad)
Temperature range Covers most EV module temperatures – continuous-service range per the grade TDS Higher continuous temperature – silicone base extends above typical PU Varies widely – chosen for thermal transfer, not force
Compression-set resistance Low set (good) Purpose-built grades hold low compression set per ASTM D3574 / D395; verify method & temp on TDS Generally good Silicone foams resist set well; grade-dependent Often not optimized Set behavior secondary to thermal spec; may relax
CFD / force-retention behavior Flat plateau Wide, flat CFD plateau (ASTM D3574 Test C); low stress relaxation in battery grades Workable Holds force; force-deflection shape differs from PU – check the curve Wrong shape Stress-strain shape is for gap fill; force may decay or spike out of window
Flammability & fit
Flame rating (UL 94) Grade-dependent Foam classes (HBF / HF-1) on select grades; verify per grade & thickness Up to V-0 Silicone foams reach UL 94 V-0 on specific grades; verify per TDS Varies Depends on the specific gap-fill product
Typical best-fit cell type Pouch & prismatic Cell-to-cell and cell-to-module; lead material for solid-state stacks as that format matures Hot / flame-rated Prismatic and module joints that run hot or need V-0 Thermal gap only Not a compression pad; for thermal transfer or tolerance take-up

How to read this. PORON microcellular polyurethane (including the EVExtend battery grades) leads for compression duty because it pairs a flat CFD plateau with low compression set across normal module temperatures. BISCO silicone foam is the move when temperature or a UL 94 V-0 requirement governs. Generic gap-fill foam is included only to mark the contrast: it is engineered for thermal conductance or tolerance take-up, not for a controlled spring force, and its stress-strain shape is wrong for compression duty.

All grade-level values (temperature, compression set, CFD, flame class) are thickness- and grade-specific – confirm against the source manufacturer's TDS for your part before final spec.

Decision support
Instrumentation·Interactive Selection

Specification Tools

Two interactive tools to take you from "I have a compression problem" to here is what to put on the drawing: a compression-force-deflection graph that shows the elastic, plateau, and densification regions with the working-deflection band, and a 3D cell-stack view that places the compression pad in the cell-to-cell, cell-to-module, and cell-to-pack positions.

1. Compression force deflection (CFD) graph

Push-back force versus compression, showing the elastic-to-plateau-to-densification shape and the working-deflection band for a cell-to-cell or cell-to-module pad.

Interactive · PORON EVExtend grade behavior

Interactive: Compression Force vs Deflection (CFD)

Push-back stress (kPa) a compression pad exerts as the cell stack is squeezed. The curve runs near-linear to ~20%, holds a flat plateau through ~20–60% (the useful working zone), then climbs steeply into densification above ~60% (over-compression danger). Hover for live values; toggle grades; pick a scenario to shade the ~20–40 kPa optimal pouch-pressure window and trace the BOL→EOL operating path as the cell swells.

Trace the operating path:
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 COMPRESSION (%) PUSH-BACK STRESS (kPa) ~20–40 kPa optimal pouch window DENSIFICATION CFD@25% (datasheet) BOL low compression EOL cell swollen 43-12 43-10 43-7
Hover the chart for live values

About these curves. The curve shape is illustrative CFD behavior for a low-compression-set microcellular polyurethane (near-linear → plateau → densification). CFD values shown are at 25% compression per manufacturer data (PORON EVExtend 4701-43 grades); the intermediate and high-compression points are modeled to illustrate the characteristic stress–strain shape and are not presented as exact measured multi-point data.

Actual push-back depends on thickness, temperature, strain rate, and stress relaxation over service life. For design qualification, request the grade datasheet or commission a sample CFD test at your stack thickness.

2. Cell-stack 3D view

An exploded cell stack – end plate, cell, compression pad, cell – labeled to show where the cell-to-cell, cell-to-module, and cell-to-pack pads live.

Interactive reference model · Pilot

3D Exploded View: Cell-to-Cell Compression Stack

Representative prismatic EV battery module compression stack, exploded along the stacking axis: module end plate → prismatic cell → compression pad → cell → pad → … → end plate, inside the module side walls. Drag to rotate, click a layer to isolate its role, toggle explode with the icon or the E key. The hero layer in amber is the compression pad — shown both cell-to-cell (between cells) and cell-to-end (against the end plates).

Open the interactive 3D exploded stack — drag to rotate, click a layer to isolate
EV-COMP-01 · MODEL REV 1.0 Procedural Geometry
Drag to rotate · Click a component · E explode
Stack Components

Select to isolate

Representative EV module compression stack; not customer CAD.

Component 00 / 05

Found your candidate family? The fastest next step is the drawing: H-O reviews it against these selections and comes back with a manufacturable option and the TDS.
Already know your grade?

Skip ahead and request your engineering review now

If your stack drawing already calls out a PORON microcellular PU grade, a PORON EVExtend battery grade, or a BISCO silicone foam – send it over for engineering review.

What goes wrong in the field

Failure modes you can prevent at spec

Compression-pad problems rarely show up at first assembly. The pack builds out, passes checkout, and ships. Then the cells cycle and swell over months to years, and the symptom appears as capacity loss, a cell that has moved, or a cushion that has gone slack. Three patterns cover most of what goes wrong, and each is a specification decision made at design freeze, not a defect on the line.

Field caution

Compression-pad faults rarely show on day-one checkout. The mechanisms below – a gap filler standing in for a compression foam, an ignored compression-set or stress-relaxation budget, or over-compression into densification – develop quietly as the cell breathes and swells. The fix is at spec, not at end of life.

Show the three failure modes tap to expand

1. Using a gap-fill foam instead of a compression foam

A thermal gap filler and a compression pad look similar on a drawing, but they are designed for opposite jobs. A gap filler is chosen for thermal conductance and tolerance take-up; a compression pad is chosen for a controlled push-back force across a moving deflection. Substitute one for the other and the stress-strain shape is wrong: the gap-fill material may relax and let the preload decay, or it may stiffen and spike the force out of the useful window as the cell swells.

The fix: specify a true compression material – PORON microcellular PU, a PORON EVExtend battery grade, or BISCO silicone foam – with a flat CFD plateau and a published compression-set value, and reserve gap-fill foam for the thermal-transfer job it was made for. If a single part has to do both, call that out so engineering can confirm a material and stack-up that actually serve both duties.

2. Ignoring compression set and stress relaxation

A pad that meets the force target on day one can still fail late if its compression set and stress relaxation were never budgeted. Compression set thins the pad permanently under sustained load, so it pushes back with less force; stress relaxation decays the held force at constant strain even when the pad has not visibly thinned.

Either one can let the preload drift below the useful window over a ten-to-fifteen-year life, after which the cell can move, electrode layers can lose contact, and any cooling or sealing contact at the joint is lost – and none of it appears at initial checkout.

The fix: specify compression set per ASTM D395 or ASTM D3574 at the temperature class your pack sees, and ask for stress-relaxation data per ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384 on long-life packs. Choose grades with field-relevant, low values for both, not just a favorable initial CFD number.

3. Over-compression into densification

Sizing a pad only for the beginning-of-life gap is the classic over-compression error. As the cell swells over life, a pad that started near the top of its working range is driven past the plateau into the densification region, where the force rises steeply. Two things follow: the push-back force climbs out of the useful window, and research indicates the elevated pressure may accelerate cell aging by closing separator pores and making electrode utilization non-uniform.

The fix: size the pad for the full beginning-of-life-to-end-of-life deflection, using the cell's expected swelling allowance, and confirm on the CFD curve that the end-of-life compression still lands on the flat plateau rather than in the densification knee. Choosing a slightly thicker pad on a flatter grade is usually better than a thin pad that runs out of plateau as the cell grows.

Reference

Material reference

Detailed notes on the material families referenced on this page for cell-to-cell and cell-to-module compression: PORON® EVExtend and general PORON® microcellular polyurethane (the lead materials, specified for a flat CFD plateau and low compression set) and BISCO® silicone foam (for higher temperature and flame-rated needs), plus a clear contrast against generic gap-fill foam.

Material selection always returns to your preload window, the beginning-of-life gap, the end-of-life swelling allowance, compression set, stress relaxation, temperature class, and any UL 94 requirement – not to a headline density.

Grade-level values are thickness- and grade-specific; verify against the source manufacturer's TDS. H-O converts these materials to drawing in low and high volume.

PORON® EVExtend. Microcellular Polyurethane Battery Compression Pad (lead material)Purpose-built EV battery grades · flat CFD plateau · low compression set · softer-to-firmer grade range
CompositionMicrocellular polyurethane foam (PORON® family), formulated as a purpose-built EV battery compression grade
Force-deflectionFlat CFD plateau across the working deflection per ASTM D3574 Test C; force stays nearly constant as the cell swells
Compression setLow compression set per ASTM D3574 / ASTM D395 on select grades; verify method and temperature on the grade TDS
Grade rangeSofter grades for pouch cell-to-cell light preload; firmer grades for prismatic and end-plate cushions
Stress relaxationLow force decay at constant strain on battery grades; request ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384 data for long-life packs
FlameFoam-class flame grades (UL 94 HBF / HF-1) available on select items; verify per grade and thickness
Form factorsDie-cut and kiss-cut pads, thin gauges for cell-to-cell, thicker cushions for end plates; adhesive lamination and stack-to-thickness; liners with pull-tabs
Best fitPouch and prismatic cell-to-cell and cell-to-module compression; lead candidate for solid-state stacks as the format matures
Grades commonly converted
  • 4701-43-7CFD @25% ≈ 21.4 kPa · density ≈ 112 kg/m³ · softest pouch cell-to-cell preload
  • 4701-43-10CFD @25% ≈ 42.6 kPa · density ≈ 160 kg/m³ · mid-range preload
  • 4701-43-12CFD @25% ≈ 60.4 kPa · density ≈ 192 kg/m³ · firmer preload
  • EVExtend 71 familydensity ≈ 320–400 kg/m³ · firmer, for rigid prismatic and solid-state stacks
  • 4701-43HBFflame-rated grade · UL 94 HBF / HF-1
  • EVExtend 43 familycompression set 5% max (ASTM D3574 @70°C, select items) · thickness ~1–3 mm · ~90°C continuous / 121°C intermittent / −20°C embrittlement

Grades commonly specified for this application; confirm current grade designations and properties against the material manufacturer's current technical data sheet. CFD, density, compression-set, thickness, and flame values are grade- and thickness-specific. Browse the PORON® industrial 4701/4790 series category for the full converted family.

Where it lives in this application: the lead material for cell-to-cell and cell-to-module compression. PORON EVExtend battery grades are formulated to hold a flat CFD plateau and a low compression set so the pad keeps useful push-back force from the beginning-of-life gap through end-of-life swelling. Softer grades suit pouch cell-to-cell joints where a light preload is the target; firmer grades suit prismatic joints and end-plate cushions where the deflection and force are higher. Confirm the grade-level CFD, compression set, stress relaxation, and any flame rating against the TDS for your gauge and deflection.

PORON® EVExtend is a microcellular polyurethane compression-pad family positioned specifically for EV battery cell compression. The properties that make it the default for this duty – a flat force-deflection plateau, low compression set, and low stress relaxation – are the same properties this page's selection factors describe. Grade-level numbers vary by item and thickness and are documented on the source TDS; H-O converts the material to your stack drawing and confirms the spec against the TDS at quote.

PORON® Microcellular Polyurethane (general compression grades)Low compression set · fine cell structure · broad thickness range · flat CFD behavior
CompositionMicrocellular polyurethane foam (PORON® family) with a fine, uniform cell structure
Force-deflectionFlat CFD behavior characteristic of microcellular PU per ASTM D3574 Test C; confirm the curve for your deflection
Compression setLow compression set per ASTM D3574 / ASTM D395; verify the method and temperature on the grade TDS
Thickness rangeAvailable across a broad range of thin to thicker gauges for cell-to-cell pads and end-plate cushions
Stress relaxationRequest ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384 data on the grade for long-life packs
TemperatureContinuous-service range covers most EV battery module conditions; verify on the grade TDS
Form factorsDie-cut, kiss-cut, laser, and waterjet pads; adhesive lamination, stack-to-thickness, liners and pull-tabs
Best fitCell-to-cell, cell-to-module, and cell-to-pack compression where an EVExtend battery grade is not specified
Grades commonly converted
  • 4701-30very soft · lowest closure force in the general family
  • 4701-40soft · the baseline general compression grade
  • 4701-40V0soft · UL 94 V-0 flame-rated version of 4701-40
  • 4701-50firm · end-plate cushions and higher preload windows
  • 4701-60very firm · tolerance take-up at high loads
  • 4790-92extra soft, slow rebound · shock and vibration duty
Where it lives in this application: the general microcellular PU choice for compression duty when a named EVExtend battery grade is not specified. It brings the same family traits – low compression set and a flat CFD plateau – that make polyurethane the default for cell-to-cell and cell-to-module pads. Because grades span a wide thickness and firmness range, the right grade is chosen by the gap, the swelling allowance, and the target push-back force. Verify the grade-level CFD and compression set against the TDS for your deflection.

General PORON® microcellular polyurethane shares the low-compression-set, fine-cell-structure character of the EVExtend battery grades; the difference is that EVExtend grades are formulated and documented specifically for battery compression. For a battery cell-to-cell or cell-to-module pad, prefer an EVExtend grade where one fits; use a general PORON grade where the application is served and the grade-level specs check out against the TDS.

BISCO® Silicone Foam (higher temperature / flame-rated)Higher continuous temperature · UL 94 flame ratings up to V-0 on specific grades
CompositionSilicone foam (BISCO® family); cellular silicone elastomer
TemperatureHigher continuous-service temperature than typical polyurethane; verify the range on the grade TDS
FlameUL 94 flame ratings available up to V-0 on specific grades; verify the exact rating per grade and thickness
Force-deflectionHolds force across deflection; force-deflection shape differs from microcellular PU – confirm the curve
Compression setSilicone foams generally resist compression set well; grade-dependent, verify on the TDS
Stress relaxationRequest ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384 data on the grade for long-life packs
Form factorsDie-cut, kiss-cut, laser, and waterjet pads; adhesive lamination and stack-to-thickness; liners and pull-tabs
Best fitCell-to-module and cell-to-pack joints that run hotter or require a stringent UL 94 flame rating
Grades commonly converted
  • BF-1000silicone foam · high-temperature / flame service
  • BF-2000silicone foam · ultra soft · even lower closure force than BF-1000, for the most delicate cell faces
  • HT-800 / HT-820 / HT-840 / HT-870high-temperature silicone foam series across a firmness range
  • kSil KSV001–KSV006 silicone spongeUL 94 V-0 silicone sponge, super-soft through firm
  • kSil V-0 70 solid / BISCO RS-seriesUL 94 V-0 flame-rated silicone grades (V-0 70 is a 70 Shore A solid)

Grades commonly specified for this application; confirm current grade designations and properties against the material manufacturer's current technical data sheet. Temperature range, force-deflection behavior, and the exact UL 94 rating are grade- and thickness-specific. Browse the closed-cell BISCO® HT/BF series and kSil® V-0 flame-resistant silicone sponge categories for the full converted families.

Where it lives in this application: the alternative to PORON polyurethane when temperature or flame rating governs. BISCO silicone foam offers higher continuous-temperature capability and stronger flame performance, with UL 94 ratings available up to V-0 on specific grades. The trade-off is a different force-deflection behavior than microcellular PU, so confirm the CFD curve and compression-set value for the grade and thickness you intend to use. Specify BISCO where the module runs above PU's continuous range or where a V-0 rating is a contract requirement.

BISCO® silicone foam is the higher-temperature, flame-capable option in this material set. It is not positioned as the flattest-CFD or lowest-compression-set choice for ordinary module temperatures – PORON microcellular PU leads there – but it is the right call when temperature or UL 94 V-0 is the controlling constraint. Verify the exact UL 94 rating, temperature range, and force-deflection behavior on the grade TDS for your gauge.

Generic Gap-Fill Foam (contrast – not a compression pad)For thermal conductance and tolerance take-up · wrong stress-strain shape for compression duty
Designed forThermal conductance and simple tolerance take-up, not a controlled spring force
Force-deflectionStress-strain shape is for gap filling; force may decay or spike out of the useful window across cell swelling
Compression setOften secondary to the thermal spec; can relax under sustained load
Why it is hereListed only to mark the contrast with a true compression material
Best fitThermal-transfer or tolerance jobs – not cell-to-cell or cell-to-module compression duty
RecommendationFor compression duty, specify PORON microcellular PU, PORON EVExtend, or BISCO silicone foam instead
Where it lives in this application: it does not, for compression. A gap filler is engineered to move heat and take up tolerance, and it is the wrong tool for holding a controlled push-back force across a moving deflection. It appears in this reference only so the contrast is explicit: if the joint needs controlled preload, swelling accommodation, and a flat force curve, a gap-fill foam is a mis-specification. Reserve it for the thermal-transfer job it was made for, and if one part has to do both, call that out so engineering can confirm a material and stack-up that serve both duties.

This entry is a deliberate contrast. The single most common compression-pad error is substituting a thermal gap filler for a compression foam – see the failure-modes section. For a cell-to-cell or cell-to-module compression pad, lead with PORON microcellular PU or PORON EVExtend, and use BISCO silicone foam where temperature or flame governs.

H-O's lane

Converting your compression pad

H-O Products converts the materials above into finished cell-to-cell and cell-to-module compression pads. The material maker supplies sheet and roll stock; H-O die-cuts, kiss-cuts, laser-cuts, and waterjets the pad to your stack drawing, laminates adhesives, and stacks to a target thickness, with liners and pull-tabs that make installation repeatable on the line. Every pad is made-to-order from your spec.

A

Cutting methods

Die-cutting for production volumes and clean through-cut pads; kiss-cutting on the release liner so pads stay on the liner for peel-and-place on the assembly line; laser cutting for tight or intricate profiles; and waterjet for soft or thick foam where a die would distort the part. The method is matched to the material, the thickness, and the run size.

B

Adhesive lamination & stack-to-thickness

Pressure-sensitive adhesive can be laminated in-line so the pad stays located on a cell or end plate during build. Where a single sheet does not reach the target thickness, layers can be stacked and laminated to a specified total gauge. Call out the adhesive side, the liner configuration, and the target thickness on the drawing.

C

Liners, pull-tabs & tolerances

Liner options include single-piece, scored split-back, and pull-tabs for repeatable line installation. Tolerances are held to the material and the cutting method – softer and thicker foams hold looser tolerances than thin, dense materials. Bring the critical dimensions and the tolerance that matters, and engineering will confirm what the chosen material and method can hold before tooling is committed.

Engineering questions

Cell compression pads: engineer-grade FAQ

Twelve of the questions we hear most from battery design and sourcing engineers. If your question isn't here, send a stack drawing or call, engineering picks up.

12 questions · click a question to expand its answer

What is a cell-to-cell compression pad and what does it do?

A cell-to-cell compression pad is an engineered foam placed between two adjacent cells in a battery stack. Its job is to hold a near-constant push-back force as the cell changes thickness. Every lithium-ion cell breathes reversibly each cycle as lithium moves into and out of the anode, and swells irreversibly over life – cells commonly run about 10–20% thicker at end of life.

The pad is specified for a flat compression-force-deflection plateau and low compression set so its force stays inside a useful window across that growing deflection, keeping electrode layers in contact without crushing the cell. A cell-to-module pad does the same job between a cell group and the rigid end plate.

How much compression force do prismatic and pouch cells need?

There is no single universal number; the target is a window that depends on the cell chemistry, format, and the cell maker's guidance. Research indicates a light-to-moderate preload commonly helps capacity retention and life, while over-compression may accelerate aging. Pouch cells have no rigid housing and rely more heavily on external compression for stability; prismatic cells are stiffer but still benefit from controlled stack pressure.

Because published beneficial and harmful pressure levels vary widely across studies and cell types, the practical approach is to set the preload window from your cell supplier's recommendation and your stack stiffness, then pick a pad whose CFD plateau keeps the force inside that window from the beginning-of-life gap through end-of-life swelling.

Cell-to-cell vs cell-to-module compression pad – what's the difference?

Both hold compression on the cell stack, but they sit in different places and see different duty. A cell-to-cell pad is the thin foam layer between two adjacent cells; it manages the gap between that pair and is usually a softer, thinner grade. A cell-to-module pad is the thicker cushion between the whole cell group and the rigid module wall or end plate; it absorbs the accumulated swelling of the entire stack and holds preload against the frame, so it is usually a firmer, thicker grade.

In cell-to-pack designs the module frame is deleted and the pad also takes up tolerance and damps vibration. All of them follow the same rules: flat CFD plateau, low compression set, low stress relaxation across the deflection the joint actually sees.

Why do pouch cells require compression but cylindrical cells generally don't?

It comes down to the housing. A pouch cell is wrapped in a flexible laminate with no rigid case, so it relies on external compression to keep its electrode layers in contact and to manage breathing and swelling – without a pad, the layers can delaminate and lose contact. Prismatic cells have a stiffer can but still benefit from controlled stack pressure as they swell.

Cylindrical cells are wound inside a rigid metal can that largely constrains the jelly roll on its own, so they are generally self-constraining and do not need an external compression pad between cells the way pouch and prismatic stacks do. That is why cell-to-cell and cell-to-module compression pads are primarily a pouch-and-prismatic concern.

What is compression force deflection (CFD) and why does it matter?

Compression force deflection (CFD) is the stress a foam pushes back with at a given percent compression, measured per ASTM D3574 Test C (the related ISO method is ISO 3386). It matters because the shape of the CFD curve is what makes a pad work. Microcellular foam shows a roughly linear-elastic region at low compression, a wide plateau in the working zone where the force barely changes, and a steep densification region at high compression.

A compression pad is designed to live on that plateau: as the cell swells and the pad compresses further, the push-back force stays nearly constant rather than climbing out of the useful window. When you specify a pad, ask for the full CFD curve and confirm your working deflection sits on the flat plateau, not in the densification knee.

PORON vs gap pad / thermal gap filler – what's the difference for compression?

They are built for opposite jobs. PORON microcellular polyurethane is a compression material: it is engineered for a flat CFD plateau, low compression set, and low stress relaxation, so it holds a controlled push-back force as a cell swells. A thermal gap filler is engineered for thermal conductance and tolerance take-up – its stress-strain shape is wrong for holding a controlled spring force, and used as a compression pad it may relax and let the preload decay or stiffen and spike the force out of the window.

For cell-to-cell or cell-to-module compression, specify a true compression material (PORON microcellular PU, PORON EVExtend, or BISCO silicone foam). Reserve gap-fill foam for the thermal job it was made for; if one part must do both, call it out so engineering can confirm a stack-up that serves both duties.

Silicone foam vs polyurethane (PORON) compression pad – which should I use?

For most EV battery modules, lead with PORON microcellular polyurethane: it delivers the flattest CFD plateau and the lowest compression set across normal module temperatures, which is exactly what a compression pad needs. Choose BISCO silicone foam when temperature or flame rating governs – it offers higher continuous-temperature capability and stronger flame performance, with UL 94 ratings available up to V-0 on specific grades.

The trade-off is that silicone foam has a different force-deflection behavior than PU, so confirm the CFD curve and compression-set value for the grade. In short: PORON PU for the best mechanical behavior in normal temperatures; BISCO silicone foam for higher heat or a stringent UL 94 requirement.

How do I choose compression pad thickness for my cell stack?

Start from three numbers: the beginning-of-life gap the pad has to fill, the end-of-life swelling allowance the cell will add, and the target push-back force inside your preload window. The pad and grade are then chosen so the compression at the beginning-of-life gap and the compression at end-of-life swelling both land on the flat part of the CFD curve – not so light that it falls below the window early, and not so thick or firm that end-of-life swelling drives it into densification.

A slightly thicker pad on a flatter grade often holds the window better than a thin pad that runs out of plateau as the cell grows. Send those numbers with your stack drawing and engineering will confirm a grade and thickness against the TDS.

Reversible "breathing" vs irreversible swelling – what's the difference?

A cell changes thickness in two ways. Reversible "breathing" is the small, repeating thickness change each charge-discharge cycle as lithium moves into and out of the graphite anode – the cell gets slightly thicker on charge and recovers on discharge. Irreversible swelling is the gradual, permanent growth over life from gas generation and solid-electrolyte-interphase growth; it does not recover, and it commonly leaves cells about 10–20% thicker at end of life.

A compression pad has to handle both at once: it flexes a little each cycle with the breathing, and it absorbs the slow one-way swelling over years – all while keeping its push-back force inside the useful window. That dual demand is why a flat CFD plateau and low compression set matter so much.

What is compression set and why is low compression set critical?

Compression set is the permanent thickness a foam loses after being compressed, held, and released – the part of the deflection the material never recovers, expressed as a percentage. Lower is better. It is measured per ASTM D395 (Method B, constant deflection, is the most specified) or ASTM D3574 for flexible PU foam; note that D395 and D3574 report against the original height while D1056 reports against the compressed height, so values from different methods are not directly comparable.

Low compression set is critical because a pad that takes a permanent set thins out under sustained load, pushes back with less force, and can eventually go slack – letting the cell move and losing contact. Purpose-built microcellular PU battery grades are specified precisely because they hold a low compression set across a long service life.

Do compression pads help with thermal runaway, and are they flame-rated (UL 94)?

A compression pad's primary job is mechanical – holding preload and accommodating swelling – not fire suppression. That said, flame-rated grades are available and matter where the pack design calls for them. Foam flame performance is classified under UL 94: low-density foams carry HBF and HF-1 classes, and V-0 is the most stringent vertical-burn rating, available on specific silicone-foam grades. Ratings are grade- and thickness-specific, so verify the exact rating on the TDS for your gauge.

At the pack level, the relevant references are UN 38.3 for lithium-cell transport safety and UL 9540A for thermal-runaway propagation testing of energy-storage systems; a compliant pad-level material can support a pack's compliance with those standards, but the pad is not itself "certified to" UN 38.3 or UL 9540A – those apply at the pack and system level.

Can I get custom pads in a specific thickness and shape, and what are the lead times and samples?

Yes. H-O is a die-cutter and converter, and every compression pad is made-to-order to your stack drawing. We die-cut, kiss-cut, laser-cut, and waterjet PORON microcellular PU, PORON EVExtend battery grades, and BISCO silicone foam to your profile, laminate adhesive where the pad needs to stay located, and stack layers to a target thickness, with liners and pull-tabs for repeatable line installation.

Samples typically ship in 3–5 business days for common configurations on materials we keep on hand, and standard production lead time after drawing approval is 2 weeks; special orders run custom lead times. MOQ varies by material and part; prototype quantities through full production runs are equally accepted. Send your stack drawing, the gap and swell numbers, and the target force through the form below for a specific quote.

Last updated · Reviewed by H-O Products engineering (ISO 9001:2015 certified converter, Winsted, CT).

Sources & references

Standards, test methods & peer-reviewed research

The standards, test methods, and peer-reviewed studies referenced throughout this page, numbered for citation. Standard editions are current as of June 2026; verify against the publishing body before final spec. H-O materials are aligned to these test methods through the source manufacturer's TDS, not independently certified by H-O unless explicitly stated on the quote.

Pack-level standards (UN 38.3, UL 9540A) are listed as context; the pad supports a pack's compliance and is not itself certified to them. The compression-versus-aging behavior described on this page is drawn from the peer-reviewed lithium-ion literature cited below.

ASTM D3574

Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials – Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams. Includes the Test C compression-force-deflection (CFD) procedure and the compression-set test reported on original height.

ASTM D395

Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property – Compression Set. Method B (constant deflection) is the most specified procedure for elastomeric and foam compression-set testing; results are reported on the original height.

ASTM D6147 / ISO 3384

Test methods for stress relaxation (force decay) of an elastomer or foam held at constant strain over time. The reference for whether a compression pad holds its preload across a long service life.

ISO 3386 (CFD / CLD)

Polymeric materials, cellular flexible – determination of stress-strain characteristics in compression. The ISO companion to ASTM D3574 Test C for compression-force-deflection / compression-load-deflection data.

UL 94

Standard for Tests for Flammability of Plastic Materials for Parts in Devices and Appliances. Foam classes HBF and HF-1 apply to low-density cellular materials; V-0 is the most stringent vertical-burn rating. Ratings are grade- and thickness-specific.

UN 38.3 (pack-level context)

UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Section 38.3 – transport safety testing for lithium cells and batteries. Listed as pack-level context; a compression-pad material supports a pack's compliance and is not itself certified to UN 38.3.

UL 9540A (pack-level context)

Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation in Battery Energy Storage Systems. Listed as pack-level context; pad-level material choices support a system's compliance and are not themselves certified to UL 9540A.

Cannarella & Arnold (2014) – stack pressure & capacity fade

Cannarella, J. & Arnold, C. B. “Stress evolution and capacity fade in constrained lithium-ion pouch cells.” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 245 (2014), pp. 745–751. Reports that a modest initial stack pressure can support capacity retention relative to an unconstrained cell, while substantially higher pressures are associated with accelerated fade – the basis for the “controlled, modest preload” framing on this page. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.165. sciencedirect.com

Module compression & aging (2021, J. Power Sources)

Peer-reviewed module-level study reporting that compressed cells outperformed uncompressed cells over cycling, and that increasing preload reduced cell expansion and resistance growth – consistent with the mechanism that light-to-moderate compression preserves electrode contact while over-compression is detrimental. Journal of Power Sources (2021). sciencedirect.com

Localized compression & lithium plating (2025, J. Power Sources)

Peer-reviewed study on the effect of localized / non-uniform compression on lithium plating and electrode utilization, supporting the point that a flat, uniform push-back across the pad face matters as much as the average pressure. Journal of Power Sources (2025). sciencedirect.com

SAE 2024-01-2430 – compression-pad selection & optimization

“A Study of Compression Pad Selection and Optimization Process for Lithium-Ion Cell & Module.” SAE Technical Paper 2024-01-2430. A published engineering treatment of how compression-pad properties (CFD, compression set, thickness) are selected and optimized for a cell or module stack. saemobilus.sae.org

Updated . Standards editions current at publication; verify against the publishing body before final spec. H-O materials are “aligned to” the test methods cited through the source manufacturer's TDS; H-O does not independently certify materials against these standards unless explicitly stated on the quote.

What to send H-O

To review your compression pad design, send:

  • Cell format and thickness
  • BOL gap
  • Expected breathing %
  • Expected EOL swelling %
  • Target pressure window
  • Pad footprint drawing
  • Adhesive / liner requirements
  • Prototype and annual volume
Quote request

Get a compression-pad engineering quote

Send a stack drawing, BOM, or spec sheet. We typically respond within one business day with a material recommendation, prototype lead time, and TDS verification against your preload window, beginning-of-life gap, end-of-life swelling allowance, temperature class, and any flame requirement.

Contact
Company address
Your compression-pad application
Stack specifications
Typical response in one business day. Samples typically 3–5 business days; production in 2 weeks.

Material data & standards. All material behavior described on this page – compression force deflection, compression set, stress relaxation, temperature range, and UL 94 flame class – is taken from the source manufacturer's technical data sheets and the cited test methods. Grade-level values are thickness- and grade-specific; verify against the source TDS for your part, gauge, and deflection before final spec.

H-O materials are “aligned to” the cited test methods through the source TDS; H-O does not independently certify materials against the standards unless explicitly stated on the quote.

Pack-level compliance. UN 38.3 and UL 9540A apply at the cell, battery, and energy-storage-system level. A compliant compression-pad material can support a pack's compliance with those standards, but the pad itself is not certified to UN 38.3 or UL 9540A. Statements about cell behavior and preload reflect published research and are qualitative; confirm targets against your cell supplier's guidance and your own qualification testing.

Get Quote →